"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
04/22/2018 at 11:53 • Filed to: None
16
4|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
04/22/2018 at 11:53 • Filed to: None | 16
| 4 |
Certainly of ones by the !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! .
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Actually desirable Chrysler LeBaron convertible for your time.
jimz
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/22/2018 at 12:09 |
|
HammerheadFistpunch
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/22/2018 at 12:24 |
|
therws like a good 3/4 inch of suspension travel in the rear before the hubshit the body
LastFirstMI is my name
> HammerheadFistpunch
04/22/2018 at 13:03 |
|
See, that’s not an issue because there was no suspension travel! The humans were the only flexible part of cars back then :)
Jordan and the Slowrunner, Boomer Intensifies
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/22/2018 at 13:15 |
|
I enjoyed his response to one of the Gawker Christmas list pages suggesting Jalopnik readers get a bus pass.